PPG issues statement regarding third merger offer AkzoNobel
Waste Management Expo 2020 MAR 12&13 BIEC, Bengaluru, India

PPG issues statement regarding third merger offer to AkzoNobel

10:32 AM, 9th May 2017
PPG logo

PITTSBURGH, US: PPG Industries Inc (PPG) has issued a statement in connection with its third proposal to AkzoNobel NV to form a combined company

PPG said that it is disappointed that AkzoNobel has once again refused to enter into a negotiation regarding a combination of the two companies, ignoring the best interests of its stakeholders, including long-term shareholders who overwhelmingly support engagement.

PPG confirm that its chairman and CEO Michael McGarry and its lead independent director Hugh Grant met with Antony Burgmans, chairman of the supervisory board of AkzoNobel, and Ton Buchner, CEO and chairman of the board of management of AkzoNobel.

Following no feedback, since PPG provided its revised proposal, PPG made yet another attempt to discuss the proposal which AkzoNobel responded to, stipulating to meet PPG.

The meeting lasted less than 90 minutes, and the AkzoNobel chairs stated at the beginning that the meeting was solely for the purpose of reviewing PPG’s revised proposal. Specifically, the AkzoNobel chairs stated up front that they did not have the intent nor the authority to negotiate.

They also did not share any concerns regarding PPG’s proposal, or analysis or comparison of their new standalone strategy versus PPG’s proposal, nor would they entertain any questions or discussion about their plan or analysis.

PPG continues to believe its proposal is vastly superior in shareholder value creation and provides more certainty to employees and pensioners than AkzoNobel’s recently announced new standalone plan.

PPG’s proposal represents a 50 percent premium over AkzoNobel’s unaffected stock price and a 24 percent premium to its stock price after the announcement of its standalone plan. The failure of the AkzoNobel boards to engage with PPG to fully evaluate and discuss PPG’s proposal reflects a continued lack of proper governance and is another attempt to avoid a true comparison on stakeholder impacts of PPG’s proposal versus AkzoNobel’s separate plan.

© Worldofchemicals News



Your Comments (Up to 2000 characters)
Please respect our community and the integrity of its participants. WOC reserves the right to moderate and approve your comment.

Related News

A Schulman to launch its newest colour & technology trend collection

AKRON, US: A Schulman Inc said that it will launch its fourth Be Colour! colour and technology trend collection. A Schulman's Be Colour! colour and t ...

Read more
Ashland gives update on final separation of Valvoline

COVINGTON, US: Ashland Global Holdings Inc (Ashland) said that it has determined the final distribution ratio relating to its previously announced dis ...

Read more
Gel derived from wood used for fast healing of burn injuries

KOLKATA, INDIA: Indian researchers have developed an ointment derived from wood that can speed up healing of burn injuries, check infection and preclu ...

Read more
CB&I bags Formosa Chemicals’ plant expansion contract

THE WOODLANDS, US: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV (CB&I) said that it has been awarded a contract by Formosa Chemicals and Fi ...

Read more
ADM to acquire interest in Israeli agricultural feed distributer

CHICAGO, US: Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) said that it has reached an agreement to purchase a controlling interest in Industries Centers, an I ...

Read more
ExxonMobil, employees contribute more than $50 mn for education in US

IRVING, US: ExxonMobil Corporation said that as part of the ExxonMobil Foundation’s 2016 educational matching gift program the company and its e ...

Read more
www.worldofchemicals.com uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. X